One of the cornerstones of sound hermeneutics
is to understand the context of a passage of Scripture. To better understand the passage this
monograph focuses on, it will be helpful to understand the historical-cultural
context of 1 John. It will also be
beneficial to have a clear view of who John was, who is audience was, and what
the world in which they lived was like.
The following sections will briefly cover each of these areas.
Historical-Cultural Context of the Book of 1 John
1 John was likely written A.D. 85-95
in Ephesus where John had relocated near the time of the fall of Jerusalem to
the Romans in A.D 70.[1] Ephesus was a wealthy shipping port capital
city of the Roman province of Asia, modern day Turkey, with a population
estimated to be in excess of three hundred thousand people.[2] During the Apostolic age, Ephesus was known
for the temple of Artemis (Diana) and proudly bore the title of “temple keeper
of the great Artemis” (Acts 19:35). This
spectacular temple was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
From a Christian perspective, Ephesus
is known for great idolatry.
Christianity posed a threat to temple and the business of making idols
which nearly cost the Apostle Paul his live during one of his visits there
(Acts 19:24, 30-31).[3] Ephesus was once a city where Christianity
thrived and many came to faith in Christ though this clearly changed as this
was one of the cities God later takes issue with (Rev. 2:4).
It is against this backdrop that John
writes his first epistle. The Letter is
in response to the rise of religious mysticism which took on Christian motifs
in an attempt to mislead Christians from the Gospel they had received.[4] This early form of Gnosticism was cause for
great concern for John and this epistle, likely meant as a companion to the
Gospel that bears his name, showed great love and yet sternness towards a
younger generation of believers.[5] The church or churches that John wrote to
were under attack by this false teaching (cf. 2:18-28; 4:1-6; 5:6-7). Among the heresies the false teachers propagated
were insisting that righteousness is not a duty of the Christian life and that
Christ is not God incarnate.[6]
Other teachers denied the humanity of Jesus while some denied His deity. Falsehood abounded and John sought to
reassure his audience.
The Biblical Author: John the Apostle
As with many other books of the Bible,
authorship is also a topic of discussion and 1 John is no different. The author of 1 John clearly claims to be an
eye witness to the events which he describes (v. 1:1-3) though he does not
explicitly identify himself in a normal salutation characteristic of
Hellenistic letters. The author writes
with what can easily be described as apostolic authority and makes no fewer
than 51 parallel references to the Gospel of John.[7] Most scholars have concluded that the fourth
Gospel, the book of Revelation, and the three letters attributed to John all
have a common author. There is no
compelling reason based on the internal evidence to deny Johannine authorship
any of these books in general and specifically the book being discussed here.
Turning to the external evidence, it
is an uncontested historical fact that the early church identified the Apostle
John, son of Zebedee, brother of James, the disciple whom Jesus loved (John
21:20, 24) as the author of the Fourth Gospel and 1 John.[8] Clement of Rome (A.D. 90) makes allusions to
1 John while Polycarp of Smyrna (A.D. 110-140) actually quotes 1 John.[9] Justin Martyr’s Dialogue 123:9 (A.D. 150-160) also quotes 1 John while others such
as Ignatius of Antioch (early A.D 100’s) and Papias of Hierapolis, who was born
A.D. 50-60 personally knew John, make allusions to 1 John in their
writings. Others who attribute 1 John to
the Apostle include Irenaeus, Origen, Dionysius, and Jerome.[10]
Here is an author who claims to be an
eye witness of the things he describes and the external evidence affirms the
authorship of the book ascribing it to the Apostle John. It can confidently be stated that the extant
epistle known today as 1 John was indeed written by the Apostle and what has
been transmitted to posterity is the letter he wrote. As
such, it is a trustworthy source of both historical information and theological
instruction both for the original audience as well as contemporary Christians.
Given the other information available
about John, it is evident that the letter was written late in his life and he
wrote as an elder statesman of the church to a church or group of churches
about which he cared very deeply. John
seeks to encourage the recipients of the letter to live godly lives (v. 1:7;
2:1), remind them of the importance of loving one another, assure them of their
salvation in Jesus Christ (v. 5:13), and refute the errors being taught by
those who split from their church. John’s
letter is modest in language yet deep in theology.
[1] Plummer,
A. The Epistles of S. John, With Notes, Introduction, and Appendices, The
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges. (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1896), 10.
[2] Walls,
David, and Max Anders. Volume 11, I & II Peter, I, II, & III John,
Jude, Holman New Testament Commentary, Holman Reference. (Nashville, TN:
Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1999), 153.
[3] Elwell,
Walter A., and Phillip Wesley Comfort. Tyndale Bible Dictionary. (Wheaton,
Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, 2001), 437.
[4] Ibid,
16.
[5] Ibid,
33-34.
[6] Paschall,
Franklin H., and Herschel H. Hobbs. The Teacher's Bible Commentary: A
Concise, Thorough Interpretation of the Entire Bible Designed Especially for
Sunday School Teachers. (Nashville: Broadman and Holman Publishers, 1972),
796.
[7] Akin,
Daniel L. The New American Commentary, Volume 38 1, 2, 3 John, electronic
ed, Logos Library System. (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers,
2001), 24.
[8] Ibid,
25.
[9] Utley,
Dr. Robert James. The Beloved Disciple's Memoirs and Letters: The Gospel of
John, I, II, and III John, Study Guide Commentary Series Volume 4. (Marshall,
TX: Bible Lessons International, 1999), 189.
[10] Ibid.
3 comments:
Nicely written!
I'm starting a Bible Study on 1 Jn. I needed a concise historical description. Thanks for the work
My pleasure Gordon!
Post a Comment